Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats
- 1 March 1965
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 59 (1) , 52-63
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1976120
Abstract
Political power in Congress, all observers agree, is highly decentralized. The factors chiefly responsible for this are also well known: weak national parties (in the Congress this results in strong constituency ties and weak leadership sanctions over members) and a highly developed division of labor through the committee system. A leadership endowed with few opportunities to punish and reward, coupled with specialization by policy area, inevitably produces an institution with numerous and disparate centers of power. Just as inevitably the politics of such an institution is compounded of persuasion, bargaining, and log-rolling.As weak as the legislative parties are, however, they still provide the major organizing force in Congress. Roll-call vote analyses have demonstrated this, and a recent study of the House Whip organizations also bears it out. Generally speaking, the single most important variable explaining legislative outcomes is party organization.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Perspectives on the House of RepresentativesThe Western Political Quarterly, 1965
- Congressmen and Their ConstituenciesThe Western Political Quarterly, 1964
- The Washington Congressional DelegationMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1964
- People and Politics: An Analysis of the American Political System.American Sociological Review, 1963
- The Congressional PartyAmerican Political Science Review, 1960