The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests
- 31 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 62 (7) , 711-715.e1
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is heterogeneity and is it important?BMJ, 2007
- Generalizing results of randomized trials to clinical practice: reliability and cautionsClinical Trials, 2006
- Why are so few randomized trials useful, and what can we do about it?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawalRheumatology, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Where now for meta-analysis?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regressionStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Comparing Results From Meta-analyses vs Large TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Small clinical trials: Are they all bad?Statistics in Medicine, 1995