The clinical significance of a small focus of well‐differentiated carcinoma at prostate biopsy
Open Access
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 92 (s2) , 92-96
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5101.2003.04406.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare a series of 121 sextant needle biopsy sets with their corresponding radical prostatectomy specimens in screened participants in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), investigating the effect of screening for prostate cancer on disease‐specific mortality and quality of life, as the clinical significance of a small focus of well‐differentiated prostate cancer on biopsy is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS The expected clinical significance of the discovered tumours was estimated using an arbitrary model combining volume, grade, and stage characteristics. RESULTS Of 34 patients who had a small focus (<3 mm on a single biopsy core) of well‐differentiated carcinoma on biopsy, only 18 (53%) were found to have minimal carcinoma (a small focus of well‐differentiated carcinoma) at radical prostatectomy, while 16 (47%) had moderately advanced or advanced carcinoma at radical prostatectomy. The preoperative prediction of minimal carcinoma improved when the amount of cancer in the sextant biopsy set was combined with the preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level. Of 12 patients with a small focus of well‐differentiated carcinoma on biopsy and a serum PSA of < 4 ng/mL, 11 had minimal carcinoma at radical prostatectomy, while there was minimal carcinoma in only seven of 22 (32%) patients with a small focus of well‐differentiated carcinoma on biopsy and a serum PSA of ≥ 4 ng/mL. CONCLUSION The predictive value of a small focus of well‐differentiated cancer on systematic sextant biopsy for a small well‐differentiated tumour in the prostate is limited. The predictive value improves when serum PSA levels are considered concurrently, but is still considered insufficient to support a base for selecting therapy for the individual patient.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Processing Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comprehensive and Standardized ProtocolJournal of Urologic Pathology, 1998
- Comparison of pathologic characteristics of T1c and non-Tic cancers detected in a population-based screening study, the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancerWorld Journal of Urology, 1997
- Distinguishing Clinically Important from Unimportant Prostate Cancers Before TreatmentJournal of Urology, 1996
- The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual BasisJournal of Urology, 1995
- The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual BasisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Second stanford conference on international standardization of prostate-specific antigen immunoassays: September 1 and 2, 1994Urology, 1995
- Identification of insignificantprostate cancers: Analysis of preoperative parametersUrology, 1994
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- The TNM classification of prostate cancerThe Prostate, 1992