Intranational Home Bias in Trade
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 82 (4) , 555-563
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300559046
Abstract
A number of recent studies have found intranational trade to be excessive compared to international trade, based on a gravity specification. The preferred explanation for this finding has been the presence of formal and informal trade barriers, with associated welfare consequences. If such barriers were indeed the sole culprit, home bias should not exist on the subnational level. We find, however, that home bias is present within U.S. states, suggesting the presence of other causes of excessive home trade. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-naturalPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United StatesPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Immigration and Trade Creation: Econometric Evidence from CanadaCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1998
- Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade?Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1996
- Affinities and frictions of trade networksThe Annals of Regional Science, 1994
- Buyer-seller links in export developmentWorld Development, 1992
- Stabilizing an Economy: A Study of the Republic of Korea (La stabilisation d'une economie: etude sur la Republique de Coree) (Estabilizacion de una economia: un estudio sobre la Republica de Corea)Staff Papers, 1969
- Distance and the Pattern of Intra-European TradeThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956
- Formulation, Analysis and Testing of the Interactance HypothesisAmerican Sociological Review, 1950
- The Interactance Hypothesis: A Gravity Model Fitting Physical Masses and Human GroupsAmerican Sociological Review, 1950