Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory?
- 31 August 2002
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 66 (2) , 105-108
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00327-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colocolic fistula caused by a previously inserted intrauterine device: Case reportContraception, 1997
- Unrecognized perforation of the uterine and rectal walls by an intrauterine contraceptive deviceActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1993
- Serious intestinal complication five years after insertion of a Nova-TContraception, 1991
- Bladder perforation by an intrauterine deviceJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1991
- The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforationContraception, 1991
- Tubal Infertility and the Intrauterine DeviceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Primary Tubal Infertility in Relation to the Use of an Intrauterine DeviceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Complete and Partial Uterine Perforation and Embedding following Insertion of Intrauterine Devices. II. Diagnostic Methods, Prevention, and ManagementObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1981
- Copper intrauterine devices in the abdomen.BMJ, 1978
- Laparoscopic removal of a perforated copper T IUD: A case reportContraception, 1973