A generalized pollination system in the tropics: bats, birds and Aphelandra acanthus
Open Access
- 8 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Botany
- Vol. 103 (9) , 1481-1487
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn260
Abstract
A number of different types of flower-visiting animals coexist in any given habitat. What evolutionary and ecological factors influence the subset of these that a given plant relies on for its pollination? Addressing this question requires a mechanistic understanding of the importance of different potential pollinators in terms of visitation rate (pollinator ‘quantity’) and effectiveness at transferring pollen (pollinator ‘quality’) is required. While bat-pollinated plants typically are highly specialized to bats, there are some instances of bat-pollinated plants that use other pollinators as well. These generalized exceptions tend to occur in habitats where bat ‘quantity’ is poor due to low or fluctuating bat densities. Aphelandra acanthus occurs in tropical cloud forests with relatively high densities of bat visitors, yet displays a mix of floral syndrome characteristics, suggesting adaptation to multiple types of pollinators. To understand its pollination system better, aspects of its floral phenology and the ‘quantity’ and ‘quality’ components of pollination by its floral visitors are studied here. Flowers were found to open and senesce throughout the day and night, although anther dehiscence was restricted to the late afternoon and night. Videotaping reveals that flowers are visited nocturnally by bats and moths, and diurnally by hummingbirds. Analysis of pollen deposition shows that bats regularly transfer large amounts of conspecific pollen, while hummingbirds occasionally transfer some pollen, and moths rarely do so. Hummingbirds and bats were comparable in terms of pollination ‘quantity’, while bats were the most effective in terms of ‘quality’. Considering these components together, bats are responsible for approx. 70 % of A. acanthus pollination. However, bats also transferred remarkably large amounts of foreign pollen along with the conspecific grains (three of four grains were foreign). It is suggested that the negative effects of interspecific pollen transfer may decrease bat ‘quality’ for A. acanthus, and thus select for generalization on multiple pollinators instead of specialization on bats.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination of Marginatocereus marginatus (Pachycereeae: Cactaceae) in Central MexicoAnnals of Botany, 2006
- INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR POLLINATION LOWERS SEED PRODUCTION AND OUTCROSSING IN MIMULUS RINGENSEcology, 2005
- Pollination Syndromes and Floral SpecializationAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2004
- FLORAL SPECIALIZATION WITHOUT TRADE-OFFS: OPTIMAL COROLLA FLARE IN CONTRASTING POLLINATION ENVIRONMENTSEcology, 2004
- Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregataCanadian Journal of Botany, 2000
- Pollinator-Mediated Competition, Reproductive Character Displacement, and the Evolution of Selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae)Evolution, 1999
- Diversity and Temporal Change in the Effective Pollinators of Asclepias TuberosaEcology, 1996
- Pollination of three species of Abutilon (Malvaceae) intermediate between bat and hummingbird flower syndromesFlora, 1994
- Partitioning and Sharing of Pollinators by Four Sympatric Species of Dalechampia (Euphorbiaceae) in PanamaAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1984
- The Adaptation of Flowering Plants to Nocturnal and Crepuscular PollinatorsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1961