Genetic Analyses of Juvenile Steelhead, Coastal Cutthroat Trout, and Their Hybrids Differ Substantially from Field Identifications
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Vol. 134 (4) , 829-840
- https://doi.org/10.1577/t04-114.1
Abstract
Because of their similar appearance and frequent hybridization, juvenile steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss and coastal cutthroat trout O. clarkii clarkii are difficult to distinguish visually. Nevertheless, field biologists often use visual methods to classify juvenile individuals. This study investigated hybridization between these species and determined the accuracy of field identification where hybridization occurred. Using a five‐point classification system, two evaluators identified 500 fish collected from three watersheds in Humboldt County, California. Individuals were then genotyped at seven single‐copy nuclear DNA genes and one mitochondrial gene, all assumed to be diagnostic for each species. Single‐locus Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, pairwise genotypic disequilibrium, and cytonuclear disequilibrium calculations revealed that subpopulations of these species were mating assortatively. Presumptive F1 hybrid individuals were rare, whereas introgressed individuals were more common. These presumptive later‐generation backcross hybrids were produced with both parental species but were more frequently produced with coastal cutthroat trout. Interspecific matings appeared to be bidirectional. Conditional classification probabilities between evaluator identifications and genotypes showed that both evaluators had moderate to substantial success identifying individuals less than 85 mm total length, whereas individuals 85 mm and larger were identified less successfully. Evaluators successfully identified coastal cutthroat trout but had moderate difficulty identifying steelhead (sometimes misidentified as hybrids) and always misidentified hybrids as coastal cutthroat trout. Although visual identifications are not without error, approximately unbiased estimates of the percentage of hybrids may be generated from a combination of visual assignments and supplementary genetic analyses.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A model of human hunting impacts in multi‐prey communitiesJournal of Applied Ecology, 2003
- Novel molecular markers differentiate Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout and steelhead) and the O. clarki (cutthroat trout) subspeciesMolecular Ecology Notes, 2002
- Molecular Markers Distinguish Coastal Cutthroat Trout from Coastal Rainbow Trout/Steelhead and Their HybridsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2002
- A Model Using Phenotypic Characteristics to Detect Introgressive Hybridization in Wild Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Rainbow TroutTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2002
- Genetic and Behavioral Evidence for Restricted Gene Flow among Coastal Cutthroat Trout PopulationsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2001
- Improved primer sequences for the mitochondrial ND1, ND3/4 and ND5/6 segments in salmonid fishes: application to RFLP analysis of Atlantic salmonJournal of Fish Biology, 1998
- Microsatellite analysis of genetic population structure in an endangered salmonid: the coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki)Molecular Ecology, 1998
- Coastal Cutthroat Trout: A Life History CompendiumTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1989
- Conservation and Distribution of Genetic Variation in a Polytypic Species, the Cutthroat TroutConservation Biology, 1988
- Natural Hybridization between Steelhead Trout (Salmo gairdneri) and Coastal Cutthroat Trout (Salmo clarki clarki) in Two Puget Sound StreamsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1985