A High-copper Amalgam Evaluated after Three Years in City and Country Practices
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Dental Research
- Vol. 65 (11) , 1353-1355
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650111501
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare the condition of Sybraloy restorations placed by the same operator in two different practice locations. Evaluations of the restorations were based on assessments for marginal fracture and staining, and for surface discoloration and roughness. Sybraloy restorations placed in a city practice were more satisfactory than those placed in a country practice. Surface discoloration proved to be unsatisfactory, especially in the country practice, but could be removed with light polishing.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical evaluation of four high-copper amalgam alloysJournal of Dentistry, 1984
- Evaluation of clinical methods for assessing restorationsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1983
- A 30-month Clinical Evaluation of the Influence of Finishing and Size of Restoration on the Margin Performance of Five Amalgam AlloysJournal of Dental Research, 1981
- Assessment of Variables in Clinical Studies of Amalgam RestorationsJournal of Dental Research, 1980
- The effect of the operator on the clinical performance of amalgamThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1979
- A clinical study of marginal integrity and tarnish behaviour of three Cu-rich amalgam systemsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1979
- Marginal integrity of amalgam alloys in relation to creep: A preliminary reportThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1978
- Influences of Clinical Factors on Marginal Adaptation and Residual Mercury Content of AmalgamJournal of Dental Research, 1975
- A two-, three-, and four-year follow-up of a clinical study of the effect of trituration on amalgam restorationsThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1974
- One-year and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgamThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1973