Surgical innovation or surgical evolution: an ethical and practical guide to handling novel neurosurgical procedures
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 100 (1) , 2-7
- https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0002
Abstract
Surgical innovation is an important driver of improvements in technique and technology, which ultimately translates into improvements in patients' outcomes. Nevertheless, patients may face new risks of morbidity and mortality when surgical innovation is used, and well-intentioned surgical "experimentation" on patients must be regulated and monitored. In this paper the authors examine the challenges of defining surgical innovation and briefly review the literature on this challenging subject. Using examples from the field of neurosurgery and in part from the personal experience of the senior author, the authors develop a model of levels of experimental acuity of surgical procedures and offer recommendations on how these procedures would best be regulated. The authors propose guidelines for determining the need for regulation of innovation. The potential role of institutional review boards in this process is highlighted.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research ParticipantsKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2002
- Ethical Regulations for Innovative Surgery: The Last Frontier?1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical systemSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation: An Initial ExperienceJournal of Urology, 2002
- Innovation in Surgery: Caveat EmptorInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2001
- Modified stereotactic insertion of the Ommaya reservoirJournal of Neurosurgery, 2000
- Outcomes Research: A ReviewNeurosurgery, 1998
- Supporting Future Surgical InnovationAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Randomized clinical trials in the evaluation of surgical innovationJournal of Neurosurgery, 1979