Pooling, Separating, and Semiseparating Equilibria in Financial Markets: Some Experimental Evidence
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 3 (3) , 315-342
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/3.3.315
Abstract
This study investigates experimental financial markets in which firms possess more information than do potential investors. Firms were given opportunities to undertake positive net present value projects which they could either forgo or finance by selling equity. Auctions were conducted among the investors for the right to finance the projects. When the theoretical equilibrium was unique, theory predicted well. When theory permitted pooling, separation, and semiseparation, only the more efficient pooling equilibrium was observed. The domination of the pooling equilibrium was robust to different experimental experiences by participants. When available, signals were used by good firms to distinguish themselves from bad.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Signalling by underpricing in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- A Theory of Negotiated Equity FinancingThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation ModelEconometrica, 1988
- The Effect of Sequential Information Arrival on Asset Prices: An Experimental StudyThe Journal of Finance, 1987
- Valuation effects of corporate debt offeringsJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Equity issues and offering dilutionJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Ripoffs, Lemons, and Reputation Formation in Agency Relationships: A Laboratory Market StudyThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Futures Markets and Informational Efficiency: A Laboratory ExaminationThe Journal of Finance, 1984
- The Informational Efficiency of Experimental Asset MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 1984
- Asset Valuation in an Experimental MarketEconometrica, 1982