Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancer
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 137 (6) , 1415-1421
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.035
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lobectomy in the Elderly Results in Fewer ComplicationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Misclassification of Hospital Volume With Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results—Medicare DataSurgical Innovation, 2007
- National survey of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: Epidemiology, pathology and patterns of careLung Cancer, 2007
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Metaanalysis of Oncologic OutcomesJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Thoracoscopic lobectomy: Evolving and improvingThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Is a Safe and Versatile ProcedureAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Thoracoscopic surgery in elderly lung cancer patientsCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2004
- National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery Study Group dataThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Thoracoscopic lobectomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993