Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 41 (3) , 279-287
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552235
Abstract
I used data from a national probability sample (N > 18,000) of British residents to investigate asexuality, defined as having no sexual attraction to a partner of either sex. Approximately 1%(n = 195) of the sample indicated they were asexual. A number of factors were related to asexuality, including gender (i.e., more women than men), religiosity, short stature, low education, low socioeconomic status, and poor health. Asexual women also had a later onset of menarche relative to sexual women. The results suggest that a number of pathways, both biological and psychosocial, contribute to the development of asexuality.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Number of older brothers and social orientation: New tests and the attraction/behavior distinction in two national probability samples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- The interaction of fraternal birth order and body size in male sexual orientation.Behavioral Neuroscience, 2003
- Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection?Evolution and Human Behavior, 2001
- Rethinking PubertyCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1996
- Physical development and sexual orientation in men: Height, weight and age of puberty differencesPersonality and Individual Differences, 1996
- Orgasm phase dysfunctions in multiple sclerosisThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptationThe Journal of Sex Research, 1986
- Volunteer bias in the psychophysiological study of female sexualityThe Journal of Sex Research, 1986
- A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- A theory of erotic orientation development.Psychological Review, 1981