Abstract
A mineral oil adjuvant failed to enhance or to prolong the somewhat shortlived immunity induced in baboons by trachoma/inclusion conjunctivitis (TRIC) vaccines, and was of little or no value in increasing or prolonging the formation of group complement-fixing (CF) antibody. Vaccines prepared with protamine sulphate or with calcium phosphate were no more immunogenic than the untreated parent suspensions.Cross tests with aqueous vaccines revealed antigenic differences in the TRIC agents examined, in terms of their ability to protect against conjunctival challenge. Strain MRC–1/OT differed from MRC–17 and from MRC–4, and MRC–187 from MRC–4f.The four Gambian trachoma agents tested were much less effective than the MRC–4 strain of inclusion conjunctivitis in inducing group CF antibody in baboons. The titre of circulating antibody bore no relation to the state of immunity to conjunctival challenge.In three baboons given mineral oil adjuvant vaccine and in one given aqueous vaccine the conjunctival responses to subsequent challenge were significantly enhanced. This reaction may be an expression of a hypersensitive state induced by relatively ineffective vaccines; like immunity, it is unrelated to the titre of CF antibody in the serum.