Paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase III study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
- 15 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 115-122
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm430
Abstract
Background: This phase III study was designed to compare the combination paclitaxel (Taxol)–gemcitabine (PG) versus carboplatin–gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with performance status of zero or one were randomized to gemcitabine 1 gm/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus either paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm A) or carboplatin at an area under the concentration–time curve of 6 mg on day 1 (arm B) every 3 weeks. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response (OR), time to progression and toxicity. Results: A total of 512 patients were enrolled and 452 eligible (arm A, 225; arm B, 227) were analyzed. All characteristics were well balanced with the exception of vena cava obstruction symptoms and lymph node involvement. Median survival was 9.97 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.74–12.0] for group A and 10.49 (95% CI 9.04–11.94) for group B. There was no difference in the OS, 1-year survival, OR and TtP. However, statistically significant differences were seen in toxicity. Conclusion: The two regimens are equally active. Myelotoxicity is worse in the CG group whereas alopecia, myalgia and neurotoxicity worse in the PG group.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Versus Gemcitabine Plus Paclitaxel in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Outcome of patients with a performance status of 2 in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1594Cancer, 2001
- Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effects on Survival and Quality of LifeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Phase III Study of Concurrent Versus Sequential Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination With Mitomycin, Vindesine, and Cisplatin in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1995
- A randomized study comparing cisplatin or carboplatin with etoposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol 07861.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990