The Effect of Context on the Intelligibility of Hearing and Deaf Children's Speech
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 24 (3) , 255-264
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400305
Abstract
This study examines the effect of redundancy of information on the intelligibility of hearing and deaf children's speech. Listeners, including those experienced and inexperienced with respect to the speech of the deaf, heard two kinds of stimuli: (1) test words in sentences that varied in the amount of redundant information available, and (2) test words excised from these sentences and presented to the listeners as isolated words. For both groups of children, test words heard in sentences were perceived correctly more often than the same words heard in isolation. However, the effect of redundant information on intelligibility was opposite to that reported for adults (Lieberman, 1963). That is, in the speech of both hearing and deaf children, the scores for test words segmented from sentences with high redundancy were greater than scores for test words segmented from sentences with low redundancy. This suggests that children are not using the same production strategies as adults to assist listeners. The data also do not support the hypothesis that experienced listeners to deaf speech achieve higher intelligibility scores than inexperienced listeners by simply making better use of context.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Young children's use of age-appropriate speech styles in social interaction and role-playingJournal of Child Language, 1976
- Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of SpeechLanguage and Speech, 1963
- The Intelligibility of Excerpts from ConversationLanguage and Speech, 1963
- Recognition Of Intelligibility Test Materials In Context And IsolationJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1957
- The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951