Risk construction in the reinfection discourses of HIV-positive men
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Health, Risk & Society
- Vol. 7 (1) , 63-71
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570500042272
Abstract
Interviews with HIV-positive gay and bisexual men in Toronto show a widespread attentiveness to the question of HIV reinfection or super-infection as a concern in safer sex decision-making. Examination of HIV reinfection discourses shows how sero-positive men find themselves at the nexus of expert knowledge and responsibilizing trends in relying on, interpreting, and extending medical evidence in constructing risk for self and others. While not an issue that overrides all others, reinfection concerns play a salient role among the reasons mentioned by those practising safe sex, and are often weighed against competing incentives and discourses by those who do not.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understandings of risk among HIV seroconverters in SydneyHealth, Risk & Society, 2004
- HIV-1 superinfectionJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2003
- Intentional unsafe sex (barebacking) among HIV-positive gay men who seek sexual partners on the InternetAIDS Care, 2003
- HIV-1 superinfection despite broad CD8+ T-cell responses containing replication of the primary virusNature, 2002
- A Patient with HIV-1 SuperinfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Antiretroviral-Drug Resistance among Patients Recently Infected with HIVNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- 'HIV is HIV to me': The meanings of treatment, viral load and reinfection for gay men living with HIVHealth, Risk & Society, 2002
- Sexual Transmission of an HIV-1 Variant Resistant to Multiple Reverse-Transcriptase and Protease InhibitorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistant to Nevirapine and ZidovudineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of GovernmentBritish Journal of Sociology, 1992