Interpreting results of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 11 (9) , 505-512
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02599596
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Calculation of likelihood ratios for serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to discriminate potentially-curable prostate cancer in men selected for having benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or in randomly selected men. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively measured PSA levels. SETTING: A tertiary referral center, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, and a community-based study, all providing PSA data. PATIENTS: We used PSA measurements from four groups of men aged 50 to 79 years: 276 men with organ-confined prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, 305 randomly selected men without clinical evidence of prostate cancer or a history of surgery for BPH recruited for a community study, 173 men without cancer but with BPH coming to prostatectomy, and 770 men without cancer and with symptoms of BPH enrolled in the North American finasteride clinical trial. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age-standardized, stratum-specific likelihood ratios for organ-confined prostate cancer were calculated separately for unselected men in the community sample and for selected men with BPH (pooling both BPH populations). Likelihood ratios ranged from 0.2 for PSA between 0.0 and 2.0 ng/mL to 54.8 for a PSA level of 10.1 ng/mL or higher in unselected men, but rose to only 2.9 for PSA values of 10.1 ng/mL or higher in men with BPH. Forty percent of the men in the community study had moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms. In these men, likelihood ratios ranged from 0.2 for PSA values between 0.0 and 2.0 ng/mL to 17.2 for PSA values of 6.1 ng/mL or higher, while in men with no or mild symptoms, likelihood ratios rose to 26.9 for PSA values of 6.1 ng/mL or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood ratios for PSA test results allow stratification of men along a continuum of risk for prostate cancer. Likelihood ratios demonstrate that the ability of the PSA test to discriminate potentially curable prostate cancer from BPH is dramatically lower in men selected with lower urinary tract symptoms than in randomly selected men.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is the ‘normal range’ for prostate‐specific antigen? Use of a receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate a serum markerBritish Journal of Urology, 1995
- A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Using Repeated Measures of Symptom Score, Uroflowmetry and Prostate Specific Antigen in the Clinical Management of Prostate DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1995
- Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference rangesJAMA, 1993
- Likelihood ratios for continuous test results—making the clinicians' job easier or harder?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- The effect of finasteride on prostate‐specific antigen in men with benign prostatic hyperplasiaThe Prostate, 1993
- Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate diseaseJAMA, 1992
- Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studiesPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987