Acculturation and Socioeconomic Position as Predictors of Coronary Calcification in a Multiethnic Sample
- 13 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 112 (11) , 1557-1565
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.530147
Abstract
Background— Coronary calcium has recently emerged as a marker of subclinical coronary heart disease. Although there has been much interest in race differences in calcification, heterogeneity within race or ethnic groups has not been investigated. Methods and Results— Data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), a population-based study of coronary calcification, were used to investigate acculturation and socioeconomic position as predictors of coronary calcification within 2553 non-Hispanic whites, 1734 non-Hispanic blacks, 1457 Hispanics, and 797 Chinese residing in the United States. Coronary calcium was assessed by chest CT. Relative risk regression and linear regression were used to estimate adjusted associations of sociodemographic variables with the presence and amount of calcium. Not being born in the United States was associated with a lower prevalence of calcification in blacks (relative prevalence [RP], 0.75; 95% confidence limit [CL], 0.61 to 0.94) and Hispanics (RP, 0.89; 95% CL, 0.81 to 0.98) after adjustment for age, sex, income, and education. Years in the United States was positively associated with prevalence of calcification in non–US-born Chinese (adjusted RP per 10 years in United States, 1.06; 95% CL, 1.01 to 1.11) and non–US-born blacks (RP, 1.59; 95% CL, 1.22 to 2.06). Low education was associated with a higher prevalence of calcification in whites (adjusted RP for no high school versus complete college, 1.17; 95% CL, 1.05 to 1.32) but with lower prevalence of calcification in Hispanics (RP, 0.91; 95% CL, 0.77 to 1.09) ( P for interaction=0.02). US birth and time in the United States were also positively associated with the extent of calcification in persons with detectable calcium. These differences did not appear to be accounted for by smoking, body mass index, LDL and HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes. Conclusions— Acculturation and socioeconomic factors are associated with differences in the prevalence and amount of coronary calcification within whites, Chinese, blacks, and Hispanics. The presence of this heterogeneity needs to be acknowledged in the quantification and investigation of race/ethnic differences.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethnic Differences in Coronary CalcificationCirculation, 2005
- Progression of Coronary Artery Calcium and Risk of First Myocardial Infarction in Patients Receiving Cholesterol-Lowering TherapyArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2004
- Duration of residence in the United States as a new risk factor for coronary artery disease (The Konkani Heart Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Coronary artery calcification in black women and white womenAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- The prevalence and severity of coronaryartery calcification on coronary arterycomputed tomography in black and white subjectsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Prognostic value of coronary electron-beam computed tomography for coronary heart disease events in asymptomatic populations11The views contained herein represent the private views of the authors and should not be construed in any way to represent those of the Department of Defense or the Department of the Army.The American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Racial differences in coronary calcium prevalence among high-risk adultsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Hispanic/White Differences in Dietary Fat Intake Among Low Educated Adults and ChildrenPreventive Medicine, 1994
- Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and CaliforniaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and CaliforniaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977