Reliability of the Isokinetic Trunk Extensor Test, Biering-Sørensen Test, and Åstrand Bicycle Test
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 26 (7) , 771-777
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104010-00017
Abstract
A reliability study was performed. To determine the intersession reproducibility of the isokinetic trunk extensor strength test, the Biering-Sørensen test, and the Astrand test by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient and the critical difference. Several physical measurements have been used in clinical evaluation of patients with chronic low back pain. Reliability can be evaluated by calculation of either intraclass correlation coefficient or critical difference, but interpretation of the results may vary depending on which method is used. For this study, 31 patients with chronic low back pain carried out the isokinetic trunk extensor test, the Biering-Sørensen test, and the Astrand test as also did age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. Measurements were performed in three separate sessions at the same time of the day and by the same experienced examiner. The intervals between the sessions were 5 to 10 days. The isokinetic tests showed a learning effect between Tests 1 and 2. For the isokinetic test, the critical difference increased with increased angular velocities from 28% to 63% in the patients and from 27% to 39% in the healthy subjects. The critical differences for the patients and the healthy individuals were 57% vs 54% for the Biering-Sørensen test and 21% vs 23% for the Astrand test, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 93% to 98% in the patients and 80%-98% in the healthy individuals. The reliability was found to be acceptable for the Astrand test and the isokinetic test at 60 degrees per second, as evaluated by the critical difference. All the tests were highly reliable according to the intraclass correlation coefficient, except for Biering-Sørensen test for healthy individuals. The critical difference is the preferable measure because calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient may give a misleading high estimate of reliability.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistics Notes: Measurement errorBMJ, 1996
- Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: An inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluationArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1996
- Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniquesOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Comparing Two Methods of Clinical Measurement: A Personal HistoryInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Reliability and Within Subject Variability of V̇E, V̇O2, Heart Rate and Blood Pressure During Submaximum Cycle ErgometryInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1993
- Reliability of Isokinetic Measurements of Trunk Muscle PerformanceSpine, 1991
- Reproducibility of incremental maximal cycle ergometer tests in patients with mild to moderate obstructive lung diseasesLung, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Physical Measurements as Risk Indicators for Low-Back Trouble Over a One-Year PeriodSpine, 1984
- The Reliability and Validity of a Physical Work TestActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1962