Analgesia for Labor
- 11 December 1997
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 337 (24) , 1764-1766
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199712113372411
Abstract
In 1992, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Anesthesiologists issued a joint statement on pain during labor that included the following: “Labor results in severe pain for many women. There is no other circumstance where it is considered acceptable for a person to experience severe pain amenable to safe intervention, while under a physician's care.”1 Therefore, many pregnant women are now choosing to receive analgesia to relieve the pain of childbirth. In modern obstetrical anesthesiology, neuraxial (epidural or spinal) analgesia is the preferred technique for pain relief. It is often achieved by the continuous . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidural Analgesia Compared with Combined Spinal–Epidural Analgesia during Labor in Nulliparous WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesiology, 1997
- Epidural Analgesia and the Incidence of Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 1997
- Combined spinal-epidural techniqueRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 1997
- Anesthesia-related Deaths during Obstetric Delivery in the United States, 1979–1990Anesthesiology, 1997
- Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparasObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labourThe Lancet, 1995
- The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993