The diagnostic interpretation of basophil activation test in immediate allergic reactions to betalactams
Top Cited Papers
- 12 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Allergy
- Vol. 34 (11) , 1768-1775
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02110.x
Abstract
Background Basophil activation by allergens, including drugs, has been used to determine sensitivity and to study IgE recognition and cross‐reactivity. Objective We sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a basophil activation test (Basotest) in patients with immediate allergic reactions to betalactams, with a later comparison between patients who were selective (those recognizing the culprit drug excluding benzylpenicillin (BP)) and cross‐reactors (those recognizing several penicillin determinants including BP). Methods Basotest to different haptens was performed in 70 patients with immediate allergic reactions to betalactams, classified into three groups: (A) skin test positive independently of CAP/RAST immunoassay value, (B) skin test negative and CAP/RAST positive, and (C) skin test and CAP/RAST negative but drug provocation test positive. Basotest was carried out by flow cytometry following the manufacturer's instructions using different betalactam determinants and results expressed as a stimulation index. Results Of the 70 patients, 34 (48.6%) were positive to Basotest (sensitivity: 48.6%), 31 (44.3%) to CAP/RAST and 46 (65.7%) to either one or the other. Considering the different groups, Basotest was positive in 50.9% of patients in Group A, 60% in Group B and 14.3% in Group C. The specificity was 91.3%. Positivity to the haptens was 28.6% to amoxicillin (AX), 21.7% to BP, 20% to benzylpenicilloyl‐poly‐l‐lysine, 12.5% to ampicillin and 2.2% to minor determinant mixture. In patients with cephalosporin reactions, Basotest to the culprit cephalosporin was positive in 77.7%. There were differences between the two reactor groups in the sensitivity of Basotest (selective to AX=50%, cross‐reactors=28.6%; χ2=10.809, P=0.004) and in the CAP/RAST (selective to AX=28.6%, cross‐reactors=61.9%; χ2=8.944, P=0.011). Conclusions The sensitivity of Basotest is similar to immunoassays (CAP/RAST). Sensitivity is improved when used in combination. Although further studies are required, Basotest results for cephalosporin allergy seem very promising. This technique does not help differentiate between selective reactors and cross‐reactors.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis of immediate allergic reactions to beta‐lactam antibioticsAllergy, 2003
- Clinical evaluation of Pharmacia CAP System™ RAST FEIA amoxicilloyl and benzylpenicilloyl in patients with penicillin allergyAllergy, 2001
- Diagnostic evaluation of a large group of patients with immediate allergy to penicillins: the role of skin testingAllergy, 2001
- Validation of a flow cytometric assay detecting in vitro basophil activation for the diagnosis of muscle relaxant allergy☆☆☆Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1999
- Penicillins and cephalosporins as allergens — structural aspects of recognition and cross‐reactionsClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1999
- Natural evolution of skin test sensitivity in patients allergic to β-lactam antibioticsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1999
- Studies of the Specificities of IgE Antibodies Found in Sera from Subjects with Allergic Reactions to PenicillinsInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 1995
- Flow cytometric evaluation of human basophilsCytometry, 1993
- Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1991
- Allergy to penicillin with good tolerance to other penicillins; study of the incidence in subjects allergic to betalactamsClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1990