Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 December 2012
- journal article
- letter
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 7 (4) , 045905
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045905
Abstract
Globally, bioethanol is the largest volume biofuel used in the transportation sector, with corn-based ethanol production occurring mostly in the US and sugarcane-based ethanol production occurring mostly in Brazil. Advances in technology and the resulting improved productivity in corn and sugarcane farming and ethanol conversion, together with biofuel policies, have contributed to the significant expansion of ethanol production in the past 20 years. These improvements have increased the energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits of using bioethanol as opposed to using petroleum gasoline. This article presents results from our most recently updated simulations of energy use and GHG emissions that result from using bioethanol made from several feedstocks. The results were generated with the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model. In particular, based on a consistent and systematic model platform, we estimate life-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions from using ethanol produced from five feedstocks: corn, sugarcane, corn stover, switchgrass and miscanthus. We quantitatively address the impacts of a few critical factors that affect life-cycle GHG emissions from bioethanol. Even when the highly debated land use change GHG emissions are included, changing from corn to sugarcane and then to cellulosic biomass helps to significantly increase the reductions in energy use and GHG emissions from using bioethanol. Relative to petroleum gasoline, ethanol from corn, sugarcane, corn stover, switchgrass and miscanthus can reduce life-cycle GHG emissions by 19–48%, 40–62%, 90–103%, 77–97% and 101–115%, respectively. Similar trends have been found with regard to fossil energy benefits for the five bioethanol pathways.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from enzyme and yeast manufacture for corn and cellulosic ethanol productionBiotechnology Letters, 2012
- Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A reviewRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012
- Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Current Oil Sands Technologies: Surface Mining and In Situ ApplicationsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2012
- Variability and Uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment Models for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Canadian Oil Sands ProductionEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2012
- Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and PetroleumEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2011
- BioenergyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2011
- Update of distillers grains displacement ratios for corn ethanol life-cycle analysis.Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,2011
- Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into productsThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010
- Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon DebtScience, 2008
- Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems: A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant EmissionsPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,2005