Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor after Induction Chemotherapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- 19 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (25) , 1781-1787
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199706193362503
Abstract
Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, or filgrastim) hastens the recovery from neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy, but its role in the management of childhood leukemia is unclear. We randomly assigned 164 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (age range, 2 months to 17 years) to receive placebo or G-CSF (10 μg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously), beginning one day after the completion of remission-induction therapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was greater than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter for two days. The clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy were documented for 21 days. The area under the plasma G-CSF concentration–time curve was measured on days 1 and 7 in both groups. Responses to the growth factor could be assessed in 148 patients (73 in the G-CSF group and 75 in the placebo group). G-CSF treatment did not significantly lower the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (58 percent in the G-CSF group vs. 68 percent in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), increase the likelihood of event-free survival at three years (83 percent in both groups), or decrease the number of severe infections (five in the G-CSF group vs. six in the placebo group). Patients treated with G-CSF had shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.011) and fewer documented infections (12 vs. 27, P = 0.009). The median total costs of supportive care were similar in the G-CSF and placebo groups ($8,768 and $8,616, respectively). Among patients who did not have febrile neutropenia during the first week of G-CSF or placebo injections, higher systemic exposure to the growth factor on day 7 was significantly related to a lower probability of subsequent hospitalization (P = 0.049). G-CSF treatment had some clinical benefit in children who received induction chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but it did not reduce the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia, prolong survival, or reduce the cost of supportive care.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in childrenMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1996
- Regulated plasma levels of colony‐stimulating factors, interleukin‐6 and interleukin‐10 in patients with acute leukaemia and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing cytoreductive chemotherapyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supportive treatment following intensive chemotherapy in acute lymphocytic leukemia in first remissionCancer, 1993
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to induction chemotherapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)Annals of Hematology, 1993
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- AbstractMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1990
- Vancomycin, Ticarcillin, and Amikacin Compared with Ticarcillin-Clavulanate and Amikacin in the Empirical Treatment of Febrile, Neutropenic Children with CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing RiskThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- Successful Intermittent Chemoprophylaxis forPneumocystis cariniiPneumonitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Successful Chemoprophylaxis forPneumocystis cariniiPneumonitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977