A comparison of manikin CPR performance by lay persons trained in three variations of basic life support guidelines
- 17 August 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Resuscitation
- Vol. 45 (3) , 195-199
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00186-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating CPR performance in basic life support:: the VIDRAP protocolResuscitation, 1998
- Community life support training does it attract the right people?Public Health, 1997
- Single rescuer adult basic life support: An advisory statement from the Basic Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)Resuscitation, 1997
- Assessing with CARE: An innovative method of testing the approach and casualty assessment components of basic life support, using video recordingResuscitation, 1997
- Effectiveness of the BBC's 999 training roadshows on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: video performance of cohort of unforewarned participants at home six months afterwardsBMJ, 1996
- Guidelines for basic life supportResuscitation, 1992
- The problem of poor retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills may lie with the instructor, not the learner or the curriculumResuscitation, 1991
- Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general publicCritical Care Medicine, 1986
- Evaluation of lay skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Heart, 1985
- The efficacy of lay CPR instruction: an evaluation.American Journal of Public Health, 1977