Genetic and cytological control of the asymmetric divisions that pattern the Volvox embryo

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The highly regular pattern in which approximately 2000 small somatic cells and 16 large reproductive cells (or ‘gonidia’) are arranged in a typical asexual adult of Volvox carteri can be traced back to a stereotyped program of embryonic cleavage divisions. After five symmetrical divisions have produced 32 cells of equal size, the anterior 16 cells cleave asymmetrically, to produce one small somatic cell initial and one larger gonidial initial each. The gonidial initials then cease dividing before the somatic cell initials do. The significance of the visibly asymmetric divisions is underscored by genetic and experimental evidence that differences in size – rather than differences in cytoplasmic quality – are causally important in activating the programs that cause small cells to become mortal somatic cells and large cells to differentiate as reproductive cells. A number of loci, including at least five mul (‘multiple gonidia’) loci, appear to be responsible for determining where and when asymmetric divisions will occur, since mutations at these loci result in modified temporal and/or spatial patterns of asymmetric division in one or more portions of the life cycle. But the capacity to divide asymmetrically at all appears to require a function encoded by the gls (gonidialess) locus, since gls mutants fail to execute any asymmetric divisions. Second-site suppressors of gls that have been identified may encode other functions required for asymmetric division. Cytological and immunocytochemical studies of dividing embryos are being undertaken in an attempt to elucidate the mechanisms by which cell-division planes are established – and shifted – under the influence of such pattern-specifying genes. Studies to date clearly indicate a central role for the basal body apparatus, and particularly its microtubular rootlets, in establishing the orientation of both the mitotic spindle and the cleavage furrow; but it remains to be determined how behavior of the division apparatus becomes modified during asymmetric division.