Abstract
An essential feature in the assessment of chest films is the comparability of successive examinations. This is particularly important in post-operative care. Several factors make the conventional departmental chest film an inappropriate standard for assessment of post-operative chest films. Pre-operative chest films in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were taken in upright and supine positions at full inspiration (total lung capacity, TLC) and at resting expiration (functional residual capacity, FRC) and subsequently compared with those taken post-operatively. Significant differences in transverse cardiac diameter, cardiothoracic ratio, mediastinal width and vertical lung height were found in films taken with the patient supine, AP [anterior-posterior] at inspiration or resting expiration, circumstances in which many chest films are taken in postoperative and intensive care patients. The taking of preoperative films at lung volumes and in postures comparable with those occurring post-operatively is advocated.