18S gene trees are positively misleading for monocot/dicot phylogenetics
- 8 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
- Vol. 30 (1) , 97-106
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00187-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- An anatomical study of anther development in Acorus L.: Phylogenetic implicationsÖsterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 2001
- MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic treesBioinformatics, 2001
- Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiospermsAmerican Journal of Botany, 2000
- The Root of Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from Duplicate Phytochrome GenesScience, 1999
- Is the Felsenstein Zone a Fly Trap?Systematic Biology, 1997
- GENE TREES, SPECIES TREES, AND SYSTEMATICS: A Cladistic PerspectiveAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1996
- Molecular Phylogenetics of Poaceae: An Expanded Analysis ofrbcL Sequence DataMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996
- A Phylogenetic Analysis of Monocotyledons Based on the Chloroplast Gene rps4, Using Parsimony and a New Numerical Phenetics MethodMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1995
- Phylogenetics of Seed Plants: An Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences from the Plastid Gene rbcLAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1993
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978