Problem-solving in general practice
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
- Vol. 14 (4) , 343-363
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00996341
Abstract
Objective: To identify problem solving strategies in general practice. Basic procedures: Three styles of scientific reasoning were defined and modelled on the medical environment. These models were tested in a simulated doctor-patient encounter. Main findings: According to the definitions contained in the models a deductive or hypotheticodeductive strategy could not be discovered. All participants used exclusively the inductive method and, more specifically, the speculative variant. This variant may be best described as a process of iterative pattern recognition. Conclusions: The manifest utilization of the inductive method carries many implications among which are the irretraceability and irreproducibility of the process. The speculative form approaches the conception of art rather than science. This is exactly what most doctors try to tell: medicine is an art. The strategy allows for flexibility and quick response to the patient's needs.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical reasoning processMedical Education, 1987
- Knowledge and clinical problem-solvingMedical Education, 1985
- Teaching Clinical Medicine by Iterative Hypothesis TestingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Medical problem-solvingAcademic Medicine, 1980
- Clinical Judgment and ComputersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Medical diagnosis: An information-processing approachComputers and Biomedical Research, 1972
- Viewpoint: The semantics of medical diagnosisInternational Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 1972
- Methods and theory in the study of medical inquiryAcademic Medicine, 1972
- Modelling the diagnostic processAcademic Medicine, 1970
- A study of diagnostic performanceAcademic Medicine, 1966