Medicare Versus Private Insurance: Rhetoric And Reality
Open Access
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 21 (Suppl1) , W311-W324
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.w2.311
Abstract
Many policymakers have called for the remodeling of Medicare to more closely resemble private insurance, which is often assumed to work better than public programs do. However, evidence from this 2001 survey demonstrates that Medicare beneficiaries are generally more satisfied with their health care than are persons under age sixty-five who are covered by private insurance. Medicare beneficiaries report fewer problems getting access to care, greater confidence about their access, and fewer instances of financial hardship as a result of medical bills. Making the program more like private insurance runs the risk of undermining a program that is working well from the perspective of beneficiaries.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Job-Based Health Benefits In 2002: Some Important TrendsHealth Affairs, 2002
- Workers And Their Health Plans: Free To Choose?Health Affairs, 2002
- Gaps in Health Coverage Among Working-Age Americans and the ConsequencesJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2001
- Assessing The Impact Of Health Plan ChoiceHealth Affairs, 2001
- Is Premium Support The Right Medicine For Medicare?Health Affairs, 2000
- Chronic illness and plan satisfaction under managed care.Health Affairs, 2000
- Budget Bills And Medicare Policy: The Politics Of The BBAHealth Affairs, 1999
- Restructuring Medicare For The Next Century: What Will Beneficiaries Really Need?Health Affairs, 1999