Do Weighted Nasoenteric Feeding Tubes Facilitate Duodenal Intubations?
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Vol. 12 (2) , 135-137
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607188012002135
Abstract
A widely held assumption is that postpyloric intubations occur more often with weighted than with unweighted nasally inserted feeding tubes. This randomized, prospective study compared the frequency of duodenal intubations using weighted and unweighted nasoenteric feeding tubes. One hundred sixteen patients had either weighted (61 patients) or unweighted (55 patients) 10F silicone elastomer feeding tubes inserted nasally 85 cm. Tubes were placed with wire stylets. Tube positions were verified radiographically within 4 hr after insertions. Radiographs were repeated daily for 3 days or until duodenal intubation occurred. Successful duodenal intubations were achieved in 35 patients (57%) with weighted feeding tubes and in 37 patients (67%) with unweighted feeding tubes. This difference was not significant. Weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes offer no advantage over unweighted tubes in achieving duodenal intubations. ( Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 12:135-137, 1988)This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Was a 'Negative' Clinical Trial Big Enough?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1985
- Preanesthetic Cimetidine and Metoclopramide for Acid Aspiration Prophylaxis in Elective SurgeryAnesthesiology, 1984
- Aspirated Nasogastric Feeding Solution Detected by Glucose StripsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1981
- Tube Feeding and Lethal Aspiration in Neurological Patients: A Review of 720 Autopsy CasesStroke, 1974