Prognostic Value of Major Extracranial Injury in Traumatic Brain Injury
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 70 (4) , 811-818
- https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e318235d640
Abstract
Major extracranial injury (MEI) is common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, but the effect on outcome is controversial. To assess the prognostic value of MEI on mortality after TBI in an individual patient data meta-analysis of 3 observational TBI studies (International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in TBI [IMPACT]), a randomized controlled trial (Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury [CRASH]), and a trauma registry (Trauma Audit and Research Network [TARN]). MEI (extracranial injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 3 or requiring hospital admission) was related to mortality with logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, and pupil reactivity and stratified by TBI severity. We pooled odds ratios (ORs) with random-effects meta-analysis. We included 39,274 patients. Mortality was 25%, and 32% had MEI. MEI was a strong predictor for mortality in TARN, with adjusted odds ratios of 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-3.23) in mild, 2.18 (95% CI, 1.80-2.65) in moderate, and 2.14 (95% CI, 1.95-2.35) in severe TBI patients. The prognostic effect was smaller in IMPACT and CRASH, with pooled adjusted odds ratios of 2.14 (95% CI, 0.93-4.91) in mild, 1.46 (95% CI, 1.14-1.85) in moderate, and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.03-1.55) in severe TBI. When patients who died within 6 hours after injury were excluded from TARN, the effect of MEI was comparable with IMPACT and CRASH. MEI is an important prognostic factor for mortality in TBI patients. However, the effect varies by population, which explains the controversy in the literature. The strength of the effect is smaller in patients with more severe brain injury and depends on time of inclusion in a study.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extracranial injuries are important in determining mortality of neurotrauma*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Outcome Prediction in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Age and Clinical Variables Are Stronger Predictors than CT AbnormalitiesJournal of Neurotrauma, 2010
- Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patientsBMJ, 2008
- IMPACT Database of Traumatic Brain Injury: Design And DescriptionJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational studyThe Lancet, 2005
- The MRC CRASH Trial: study design, baseline data, and outcome in 1000 randomised patients in the pilot phaseEmergency Medicine Journal, 2002
- Unexpected Contribution of Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury to Death after Major TraumaThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1999
- Outcome after acute extradural haematoma, influence of additional injuries and neurological complications in the ICUInjury, 1996
- COMPARISON OF MORTALITY, MORBIDITY, AND SEVERITY OF 59,713 HEAD INJURED PATIENTS WITH 114,447 PATIENTS WITH EXTRACRANIAL INJURIESPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1994
- Mortality of Patients with Head Injury and Extracranial Injury Treated in Trauma CentersPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1989