DO NOT WEIGHT FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Statistics
- Vol. 35 (1) , 89-92
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.1993.tb01315.x
Abstract
Summary: The potential role of weighting in kernel regression is examined. The concept that weighting has something to do with heteroscedastic errors is shown to be false. However, weighting does affect bias, and ways in which this might be exploited are indicated.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- On a Semiparametric Variance Function Model and a Test for HeteroscedasticityThe Annals of Statistics, 1995
- [Choosing a Kernel Regression Estimator]: CommentStatistical Science, 1991
- Choosing a Kernel Regression EstimatorStatistical Science, 1991
- Applied Nonparametric RegressionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- On the bias of variable bandwidth curve estimatorsBiometrika, 1990
- The Kernel Estimate of a Regression Function in Likelihood-Based ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- Transformation and Weighting in RegressionPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Estimation of Heteroscedasticity in Regression AnalysisThe Annals of Statistics, 1987
- Some Aspects of the Spline Smoothing Approach to Non-Parametric Regression Curve FittingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1985