Who Decides?
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 17 (3) , 268-283
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017003003
Abstract
A criminal complainant's decision to prosecute has long been recognized as an important aspect of criminal justice case processing. Much of the literature regards this decision as a simple expression of a victim's volition. On the basis of interviews with detectives, prosecutors, and a victims' advocate and quantitative analyses (based on a sample of police files), it was concluded that police officers have a substantial influence on a complainant's decision to prosecute. The study also assessed evidence for three explanations for officials influencing complainants' decisions: feminist conflict theory, Black's “behavior of law” hypotheses, and the need to efficiently allocate scarce resources. It was found that the need to efficiently allocate resources best explained the data.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- Sexual Assault and Its Prosecution: A Comparison with Other CrimesThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1982
- Few convictions in rape cases: Empirical evidence concerning some alternative explanationsJournal of Criminal Justice, 1981
- Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Social perception of rape victims: The impact of legal reform.Law and Human Behavior, 1978
- Routine Police Arrest Practices: A Commonweal PerspectiveSocial Problems, 1974
- The Social Organization of ArrestStanford Law Review, 1971
- Calls for Police AssistanceAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1970
- The American JuryPublished by Test accounts ,1967
- Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of JusticeThe Yale Law Journal, 1960