Divergent Paths of Immigration Politics in the United States and Australia
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Population and Development Review
- Vol. 27 (3) , 525-551
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00525.x
Abstract
The United States and Australia converged by the mid‐1980s on receptive and expan sive immigration policies reflecting “client” politics. Australia has since pursued a more restrictive and selective course while the United States has resisted pressures toward such a stance. The authors account for these differences by assessing the theoretical perspectives of interests, rights, and states. Conflicts among groups with direct interests in policy outcomes are the principal source of immigration politics, but a comparison of the roles of rights and state institutions helps explain peculiarities of the two cases. The distinctive Australian policy trajectory is shaped by greater volatility of public opinion about immigration and multiculturalism, and by political institutions that are more responsive to popular sentiment.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labor Unions and Immigration Policy in FrancePublished by JSTOR ,1999
- A Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion toward Immigrants and Immigration PoliciesPublished by JSTOR ,1999
- Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted ImmigrationWorld Politics, 1997
- Asylum and State SovereigntyComparative Political Studies, 1997
- Contemporary American Attitudes Toward U.S. ImmigrationInternational Migration Review, 1996
- Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic StatesInternational Migration Review, 1995
- Openings in the wall: transnational migrants, labor unions, and U.S. immigration policyInternational Organization, 1995
- An Evaluation of International Migration Theory: The North American CasePopulation and Development Review, 1994
- Theories of International Migration: A Review and AppraisalPopulation and Development Review, 1993
- International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic orderInternational Organization, 1982