A Comparison of Sodium Fusidate Ointment (‘Fucidin’)Alone Versus Oral Antibiotic Therapy in Soft-Tissue Infections
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 5 (4) , 289-294
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007997709110182
Abstract
A Study Was Carried Out In 90 Patients With Superficial, Soft-Tissue Infections To Compare The Effectiveness Of Topical Treatment With 2 % Sodium Fusidate Ointment Used Alone, And Oral Antibiotic Therapy (Clindamycin, Erythromycin, Or Flucloxacillin) Plus A Placebo Ointment. The Results Showed That The Number Of Days For Healing To Take Place Was Significantly Shorter With Sodium Fusidate Ointment, And There Was Also A Highly Significant Preference For It Over Oral Antibiotic Therapy In The Subjective Assessment Of Clinical Response. Bacteriological Investigations Of Swabs From 58 Of The Patients Showed Staphylococcus Aureus To Be The Most Frequently Isolated Pathogen: 72% Of The Strains Were Penicillin-Resistant But All Were Sensitive To Sodium Fusidate. It Is Suggested That Oral Antibiotic Therapy Should Be Reserved For Those Cases Where There Is Evidence Of Systemic Spread Of The Infection And That Sodium Fusidate Ointment, With Or Without Surgical Drainage, Should Be The Standard Initial Treatment In The Out-Patient Andgeneral Practice Situation.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pyogenic cutaneous infections in East African children treated with Fucidin ointmentJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 1971
- ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SEPTIC LESIONSThe Lancet, 1970
- PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION OF SODIUM FUSIDATE AND FUSIDIC ACID*British Journal of Dermatology, 1969
- Trial of Phenoxymethylpenicillin, Phenethicillin, and Lincomycin in Treatment of Staphylococcal Sepsis in a Casualty DepartmentBMJ, 1968