Ethics Committees and Decisions to Limit Care
- 12 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 260 (6) , 803-807
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410060073030
Abstract
Decisions to limit care for terminally ill patients present a number of ethical and legal issues. For the past 13 years, the Optimum Care Committee (OCC) of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, has provided advice for physicians faced with such issues. I have reviewed the experience of the committee with the 73 cases on which it provided consultation from 1974 through 1986. In addition, I have compared these cases with those of all 113 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital who were accorded do-not-resuscitate status without OCC input during a three-month period and found that the two groups differed significantly on a number of clinical variables. I have also found that the OCC cases fall into six categories, each of which presents different ethical and legal issues. In addition, the use of the OCC within the hospital is increasing especially with regard to certain categories of cases. The committee has dealt with controversial issues in a consistent and ethically forthright manner, but legal and moral questions remain. More discussion of the role of ethics committees in withdrawal-of-care cases is needed. (JAMA1988;260:803-807)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders for the Incompetent Patient in the Absence of Family ConsentLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1986
- Choices about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- On Feeding the DyingHastings Center Report, 1983
- Allowing the Debilitated to DieNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Right to DieHastings Center Report, 1978
- The Saikewicz Decision: Judges as PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Hospital Ethics Committees: Is There a Role?Hastings Center Report, 1977