Extreme sexual dimorphism in a Miocene hominoid
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 352 (6331) , 151-153
- https://doi.org/10.1038/352151a0
Abstract
Some Miocene hominoids may have been extremely sexually dimorphic for body size, inferred from the apparent dimorphism of dental and gnathic remains. But this has never been demonstrated convincingly for any fossil species because of small sample sizes, uncertainties about the number of species in most fossil samples, and the inability to reliably sex individual specimens. Here we demonstrate a case of extreme dental dimorphism, and presumed body-size dimorphism, in a Miocene hominoid sample in which these limitations have been overcome. Lufengpithecus lufengensis from the late Miocene site of Lufeng, China, was more dimorphic than the most dimorphic living hominoid, the orangutan, and may have been more dimorphic than any living anthropoid.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hominoid dental variability and species number at the late Miocene site of Lufeng, ChinaAmerican Journal of Primatology, 1989
- Species recognition and sexual dimorphism in Proconsul and RangwapithecusJournal of Human Evolution, 1986
- Distinguished Lecture: Hominoid Evolution and Hominoid OriginsAmerican Anthropologist, 1986
- Sexual dimorphism in proconsulHuman Evolution, 1986
- Ontogenetic approaches to sexual dimorphism in anthropoidsHuman Evolution, 1986
- On the origins of body size dimorphism in primatesHuman Evolution, 1986
- Sexual dimorphisms in dental dimensions of higher primatesAmerican Journal of Primatology, 1984
- Feeding ecology and the evolution of body size of baboonsAfrican Journal of Ecology, 1983
- Ramapithecus and Sivapithecus from China: Some implications for higher primate evolutionAmerican Journal of Primatology, 1983
- Sexual dimorphism in RamapithecinaeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982