HOW DID MORALITY EVOLVE?
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
- Vol. 26 (1) , 49-89
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1991.tb00803.x
Abstract
This paper presents and criticizes Alexander's evolutionary theory of morality (1987). Earlier research, on which Alexander's theory is based, is also reviewed. The propensity to create moral systems evolved because it allowed ancestral humans to limit conflict within cooperating groups and thus form larger groups, which were advantageous because of intense between-group competition. Alexander sees moral codes as contractual, and the primary criticism of his theory is that moral codes are not completely contractual but also coercive. Ways of evaluating Alexander's theory as well as modified versions of it are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and OptimalityJohn Dupré, directeur de la publication Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1987, xiv, 359 p., 27,50 $Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 1992
- Explaining Biased Sex Ratios in Human Populations: A Critique of Recent Studies [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1990
- Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-cultural StudyCurrent Anthropology, 1989
- Evolutionary Social Psychology and Family HomicideScience, 1988
- On Cultural and Reproductive Success: Kipsigis EvidenceAmerican Anthropologist, 1987
- Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1985
- kin selection and cultureAmerican Ethnologist, 1983
- The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971
- Adopt a Daughter‐in‐Law, Marry a Sister: A Chinese Solution to the Problem of the Incest TabooAmerican Anthropologist, 1968
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964