Do Persons With Diabetes Know Their (AIC) Number?
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Diabetes Educator
- Vol. 28 (1) , 99-105
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014572170202800111
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to compare self-reported knowledge about Al C testing with information from the medical record. METHODS A telephone survey was conducted among patients with diabetes in a rural fee-for-service practice and a community health center. Self-reported information regarding Al C testing, the last Al C value, and perceived blood glucose control was compared with the most current Al C value documented in the medical record. RESULTS Seventy five percent of survey respondents reported having 1 or more Al C tests in the past year, which generally agreed with information from their medical records. However, only 24% of those who reported having a test remembered the actual value, and the self-reported values correlated weakly with the last Al C on the medical record. Among those with a documented Al C value, half described their blood glucose as very well controlled. The last Al C value, however, was <7.0% in only half of those respondents. CONCLUSIONS Persons with diabetes were aware of their previous Al C testing but did not interpret the values accurately in relation to their own glycemic control. If clinicians expect patient knowledge and understanding of glycemic control measures to improve outcomes of care, patient education will need to emphasize the meaning of these values.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Glycemic Control: Can Techniques Used in a Managed Care Setting Be Successfully Adapted to a Rural Fee-for-Service Practice?American Journal of Medical Quality, 2001
- Comparing Self-Reported Measures of Diabetes Care With Similar Measures From a Chart Audit in a Well-Defined PopulationAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2001
- Effects of oral hypoglycemic agents and diet on protein metabolism in type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- The validity of self-reported diabetes quality of care measures.International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1999
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Population-Based Assessment of the Level of Care Among Adults With Diabetes in the U.SDiabetes Care, 1998
- Cholesterol Awareness After Case-Finding: Do Patients Really Know Their Cholesterol Numbers?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1997
- Randomised controlled trial in northern England of the effect of a person knowing their own serum cholesterol concentration.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- The Impact of a Color-Classified HbA1c Graph for Self-Monitoring and Self-Adjustment of Long-Term Glycemic ControlDiabetes Care, 1993
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993