Taxonomy of Australian clinical isolates of the genus Photorhabdus and proposal of Photorhabdus asymbiotica subsp. asymbiotica subsp. nov. and P. asymbiotica subsp. australis subsp. nov.
Open Access
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Microbiology Society in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Vol. 54 (4) , 1301-1310
- https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03005-0
Abstract
The relationship of Photorhabdus isolates that were cultured from human clinical specimens in Australia to Photorhabdus asymbiotica isolates from human clinical specimens in the USA and to species of the genus Photorhabdus that are associated symbiotically with entomopathogenic nematodes was evaluated. A polyphasic approach that involved DNA–DNA hybridization, phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA and gyrB gene sequences and phenotypic characterization was adopted. These investigations showed that gyrB gene sequence data correlated well with DNA–DNA hybridization and phenotypic data, but that 16S rRNA gene sequence data were not suitable for defining species within the genus Photorhabdus. Australian clinical isolates proved to be related most closely to clinical isolates from the USA, but the two groups were distinct. A novel subspecies, Photorhabdus asymbiotica subsp. australis subsp. nov. (type strain, 9802892T=CIP 108025T=ACM 5210T), is proposed, with the concomitant creation of Photorhabdus asymbiotica subsp. asymbiotica subsp. nov. Analysis of gyrB sequences, coupled with previously published data on DNA–DNA hybridization and PCR-RFLP analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, indicated that there are more than the three subspecies of Photorhabdus luminescens that have been described and confirmed the validity of the previously proposed subdivision of Photorhabdus temperata. Although a non-luminescent, symbiotic isolate clustered consistently with P. asymbiotica in gyrB phylogenetic analyses, DNA–DNA hybridization indicated that this isolate does not belong to the species P. asymbiotica and that there is a clear distinction between symbiotic and clinical species of Photorhabdus.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- PhotorhabdusSpeciesBioluminescent Bacteria as Human Pathogens?Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Polyphasic classification of the genus Photorhabdus and proposal of new taxa: P. luminescens subsp. luminescens subsp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii subsp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. laumondii subsp. nov., P. temperata sp. nov., P. temperata subsp. temperata subsp. nov. and P. asymbiotica sp. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1999
- Phenotypic and DNA Relatedness between Nematode Symbionts and Clinical Strains of the Genus Photorhabdus (Enterobacteriaceae)International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1996
- DNA Relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), Symbiotic Bacteria of Entomopathogenic Nematodes, and a Proposal To Transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a New Genus, Photorhabdus gen. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1993
- Use of Starch Gel Electrophoresis in the Taxonomy of the Genus Heterorhabditis (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae)Nematologica, 1987
- Taxonomic Study of Xenorhabdus, a Genus of Bacteria Symbiotically Associated with Insect Pathogenic NematodesInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1983
- Use of a nematode, Heterorhabditis heliothidis, to control black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, in potted plantsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1981
- The Quantitative Measurement of DNA Hybridization from Renaturation RatesEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1970
- Evolution of Protein MoleculesPublished by Elsevier ,1969
- Construction of Phylogenetic TreesScience, 1967