Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 8 (6) , 968-974
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Medtronic
- AGC
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- Distribution-based and anchor-based approaches provided different interpretability estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome QuestionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Simple as Possible? Or Too Simple?Medical Care, 2003
- Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of LifeMedical Care, 2003
- Simplifying Outcome MeasurementSpine, 2002
- SF-36 Health Survey UpdateSpine, 2000
- Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status MeasuresPharmacoEconomics, 1999
- Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989