A Comparison between Maprotiline (Ludiomil) and Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depressive Reaction in General Practice
- 1 March 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of International Medical Research
- Vol. 3 (2) , 108-113
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030006057500300209
Abstract
In this trial in depressive reaction in general practice, maprotiline and amitriptyline, in a fixed dosage regime of 50 mg three times daily for three weeks, were equally effective therapeutic agents; all but two of the patients improving during the trial. Thirteen patients (16% of the group) withdrew from the study due to the severity of side-effects, predominantly because of drowsiness. In those patients who completed the trial both compounds were relatively well tolerated. The general pattern of side-effects ('mild’ drowsiness and dry mouth) was similar for both treatments, although maprotiline appeared to cause more dizziness than amitriptyline.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Comparative Evaluation of Maprotiline, a New Antidepressant DrugInternational Pharmacopsychiatry, 1971
- A Comparative Trial of Ro 4-6270 and Amitriptyline in Depressive IllnessThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967
- Comparative Trial of Nortriptyline and AmitriptylineScottish Medical Journal, 1964
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Amitriptyline, Perphenazine, and Their Combination in the Treatment of Chronic Psychotic Female PatientsThe Journal of New Drugs, 1964