The Right to Health and the Nevirapine Case in South Africa
- 20 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 348 (8) , 750-754
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmlim022737
Abstract
This article describes the successful legal challenge of the South African government's controversial decision to restrict the availability of nevirapine for use in preventing the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from mother to infant. With its order requiring the government to provide comprehensive health services to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, the Constitutional Court of South Africa upheld the public's right to health care, as guaranteed in the South African constitution.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- S Africa soaks up pressure to change HIV/AIDS policyThe Lancet, 2002
- Shadow on the continent: public health and HIV/AIDS in Africa in the 21st centuryThe Lancet, 2002
- In the High Court of South Africa, Case No. 4138/98: The Global Politics of Access to Low-Cost AIDS Drugs in Poor CountriesKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2002
- The Major Infectious Diseases in the World — To Treat or Not to Treat?New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- HIV/AIDS: The Peril of PseudoscienceScience, 2000
- The Recognition of Access to Health Care as a Human Right in South Africa: Is It Enough?Health and Human Rights, 2000
- Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Children confronting HIV/AIDS: charting the confluence of rights and health.Health and Human Rights, 1998