Part three: Assessing womens progress in labour
- 6 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by Mark Allen Group in British Journal of Midwifery
- Vol. 8 (7) , 449-457
- https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2000.8.7.8108
Abstract
The monitoring of progress in labour is still driven by a preoccupation with time and definitions that pathologise labour if it deviates from strict time parameters. This may have a place where obstetric services are vast distances from primary care settings and where women's health is severely compromised prior to labour. However, for the vast majority of women in the UK, time limits on the first stage of labour reflect practitioners’ predisposition to distrust normal labour physiology.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Domestic violence and pregnancy: a midwifery issuePublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,2000
- Care in normal labour: a feminist perspectivePublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1997
- Prelabour rupture of membranes at term: home managementBritish Journal of Midwifery, 1996
- Unwanted vaginal examinationsBritish Journal of Midwifery, 1994
- Communication of Pain: Vocalization as an Indicator of the Stage of LabourAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Teaching vaginal examination.BMJ, 1992
- The law, medical students, and assault.BMJ, 1992
- “You'll Feel Me Touching You, Sweetie”: Vaginal Examinations During the Second Stage of LaborBirth, 1992
- Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidaeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- Premature spontaneous rupture of the membranesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1964