Monte Carlo Studies in Nonmetric Scaling
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 43 (1) , 115-117
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294095
Abstract
In response to Arabie several random ranking studies are compared and discussed. Differences are typically very small, however it is noted that those studies which used arbitrary configurations tend to produce slightly higher stress values. The choice of starting configuration is discussed and we suggest that the use of a principal components decomposition of the doubly centered matrix of dissimilarities, or some transformation thereof, will yield an initial configuration which is superior to a randomly chosen one.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random Versus Rational Strategies for Initial Configurations in Nonmetric Multidimensional ScalingPsychometrika, 1978
- Re-Evaluation of Monte Carlo Studies in Nonmetric Multidimensional ScalingPsychometrika, 1976
- Representation of Structure in Similarity Data: Problems and ProspectsPsychometrika, 1974
- On Random Rankings Studies in Nonmetric ScalingPsychometrika, 1974
- Concerning Monte Carlo Evaluations of Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling AlgorithmsPsychometrika, 1973
- A TABLE OF EXPECTED STRESS VALUES FOR RANDOM RANKINGS IN NONMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALINGMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1973
- A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Three Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling AlgorithmsPsychometrika, 1972
- QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF STRESS IN KRUSKAL'S MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING TECHNIQUEBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1971
- A Monte Carlo Investigation of the Statistical Significance of Kruskal's Nonmetric Scaling ProcedurePsychometrika, 1969
- Goodness of fit for random rankings in Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure.Psychological Bulletin, 1969