When does coordination require centralization?

Preprint
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
  • 1 January 2008
    • preprint
      • Published in RePEc
Abstract
This paper compares centralized and decentralized coordination when managers are privately informed and communicate strategically. We consider a multidivisional organization in which decisions must be adapted to local conditions but also coordinated with each other. Information about local conditions is dispersed and held by self-interested division managers who communicate via cheap talk. The only available formal mechanism is the allocation of decision rights. We show that a higher need for coordination improves horizontal communication but worsens vertical communication. As a result, decentralization can dominate centralization even when coordination is extremely important relative to adaptation.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: