Reply to “Possibility of distinguishing between identical particles in quantum collision processes”
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 59 (4) , 3133-3135
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.59.3133
Abstract
Bencze and Chandler, in the preceding paper, are highly critical of the convergent close-coupling method as applied to the calculation of differential ionization processes. We argue that the criticism is unwarranted and arises from a misunderstanding of the close-coupling theory.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Close-Coupling Theory of Ionization: Successes and FailuresPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Near-threshold electron impact ionization of atomic hydrogenJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 1997
- Calculation of ionization within the close-coupling formalismPhysical Review A, 1996
- -wave model for electron-hydrogen scatteringPhysical Review A, 1996
- Simplified model of electron scattering usingR-matrix methodsPhysical Review A, 1995
- Two-Electron Correlations inNear ThresholdPhysical Review Letters, 1995
- Convergent close-coupling calculations of electron-hydrogen scatteringPhysical Review A, 1992
- R -matrix theory of electron scattering at intermediate energiesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1987
- Triple differential cross sections for electron impact ionisation of atomic hydrogen-a coupled pseudostate calculationJournal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics, 1987
- Theory of the Ionization of Atoms by Electron ImpactReviews of Modern Physics, 1968