Ultrasonic-pathological comparison of the human arterial wall. Verification of intima-media thickness.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Recent intravascular ultrasound experience challenges the accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of arterial wall thickness. We reevaluated the correlation between histological and sonographic measurements of intima-media thickness using standard transcutaneous vascular technology. Carotid and femoral arterial segments were imaged before and after fixation using a 7-MHz linear-array vascular transducer. Log compression and beam orientation were varied. Mean intima, media, and adventitia thicknesses were measured and compared with corresponding histological tunica. Tissue processing caused 2.5% shrinkage. Intraobserver reading error was 0.7% for histology and 5.4% for sonography. Ultrasound overestimated the thickness of the intima and adventitia and underestimated the thickness of the media. For combined intima-media thickness, the differences between histology and imaging were insignificant, averaging 4% for the carotid artery and 9% for the femoral artery in the far-wall projection. In the near-wall projection, sonographic intima-media thickness was 20% less than that determined histologically. We conclude that ultrasonography is limited mainly by axial resolution in quantifying the dimensions of individual arterial tunica but is capable of accurately measuring far-wall intima-media thickness.