Working with the community
- 26 August 1995
- Vol. 311 (7004) , 524-525
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7004.524
Abstract
General practitioners could gain much from greater involvement When viewed from hospitals or the Department of Health, general practitioners may seemembedded in their local communities, ideally placed to act as “the patients' advocate.”1 But the view from an underprivileged housing estatemay be that the local practice is just as remote as the local teaching hospital. Althoughthe Health of the Nation asserts that many of the solutions to long term health problems are outside the remit of traditional heath services,2 general practitioners still regard health mainly in terms of the medical needs of individual patients and families. If general practitioners and the primary health care team are fully to represent their patients' wider health needs they will need to find ways of relating to their communities that go beyond merely understanding the epidemiological data. “Community” implies a shared interest or geographical locality.3 If the primary health care team is to work more closely with local people it will have to consider what communities exist within its practice population. If it is going to ask people their views it will need to value the replies and be prepared to look for ways of responding to them. It will have to recognise how people become motivated to learn about health and the value of peer group support in this process.4 In future, health professionals …Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Listening to local voices: adapting rapid appraisal to assess health and social needs in general practiceBMJ, 1994
- Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?Social Science & Medicine, 1994
- Partners or partisans? Patient participation at Marylebone Health Centre.1993
- Focus Groups: Theory and PracticeJournal of Marketing Research, 1991
- Patient participation in general practice: who participates?1991
- Satisfaction with the NHS: what is it and can we measure it?1989