Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine Chemotherapy for Advanced Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelial Tract: A Phase II Trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network
- 15 June 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (12) , 3018-3024
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.12.3018
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with advanced unresectable urothelial carcinoma entered this multi-centered, community-based, phase II trial between May 1997 and December 1999. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15; courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had objective response or stable disease continued treatment for six courses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 54 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 67%) had major responses to treatment, including 7% complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 patients (30%) remain alive and nine (17%) are progression-free. The median survival for the entire group was 14.4 months; 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Seven (47%) of 15 patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy responded to paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic, including leukopenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and anemia (28%). Ten patients (19%) required hospitalization for neutropenia and fever, and one patient had treatment-related septic death. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in the first- or second-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Response rate and duration compare favorably with those produced by other active, first-line regimens. This regimen should be further evaluated in phase II and III studies, as well as in patients with compromised renal function.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 2000CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2000
- Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Editorial: Bladder CancerJournal of Urology, 1996
- A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for advanced carcinoma of the bladderEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Usefulness and Limitations of Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin And Cisplatin for the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial CancerJournal of Urology, 1990
- A prospective randomized trial comparing MVAC and CISCA chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial tumors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Long-term follow-up in patients treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) for transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder: Cause for concernUrology, 1989
- Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Efficacy and patterns of response and relapseCancer, 1989
- M-Vac (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin) Chemotherapy for Transitional Cell Carcinoma: The Princess Margaret Hospital ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1989